PDA

View Full Version : 8 tapes sent to NFL on Spygate...(NY Times)


kjbad
05-08-2008, 07:22 AM
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/05/08/sports/football/08nfl.html?_r=2&ref=football&oref=slogin&oref=slogin

Ex-Patriots Assistant Sends the N.F.L. Eight Tapes

By GREG BISHOP
Published: May 8, 2008

A former New England Patriots employee has sent the N.F.L. eight videotapes showing the team recorded play-calling signals by coaches of five opponents in six games between the 2000 and 2002 seasons, in violation of league rules.

But the group of tapes does not include video of the St. Louis Rams’ walk-through practice the day before the 2002 Super Bowl. The employee, Matt Walsh, had been linked to such a tape by news media speculation.

Walsh emerged as a pivotal figure in the spying controversy that enveloped the Patriots last season after they were caught taping Jets defensive signals in the season opener.

Walsh, who worked for the Patriots from 1997 to 2003, agreed to turn over the tapes and other evidence by Thursday under an agreement reached last month between lawyers for the N.F.L. and Walsh. The agreement indemnifies Walsh from all future legal fees.

Walsh’s tapes show that the Patriots recorded the signals of offensive and defensive coaches in regular-season games against the Miami Dolphins, the Buffalo Bills, the Cleveland Browns and the San Diego Chargers and against the Pittsburgh Steelers in the 2002 American Football Conference championship game. In that game, the tape has been edited to show Steelers coaches signaling plays, followed by two different camera angles of the actual plays that were called.

The New York Times obtained a list of the Walsh videotapes. The information was later confirmed by Walsh’s lawyer, Michael Levy, from the Washington offices of McKee Nelson.

The N.F.L. declined to comment Wednesday night because it did not have the tapes in its possession.

The Boston Herald reported the day before this year’s Super Bowl that a tape of the Rams existed, citing an anonymous source.

Walsh does not possess such a tape, Levy said.

“Mr. Walsh has never claimed to have a tape of the walk-through,” Levy said in a telephone interview. “Mr. Walsh has never been the source of any of the media speculation about such a tape. Mr. Walsh was not the source for the Feb. 2 Boston Herald article.”

On Tuesday, Walsh is scheduled to speak with Commissioner Roger Goodell and Senator Arlen Specter in separate meetings. Walsh could provide additional information at that time, including how the taping worked, how extensive it was, which Patriots employees were involved and the significance of the evidence he handed over.

The first tape is dated Sept. 25, 2000, from a game the previous day. The last is from Sept. 29 two years later.

All the tapes are scheduled to arrive at N.F.L. offices Thursday morning.

Levy would not say whether Walsh was behind the camera on each tape, but confirmed that Walsh obtained the first seven tapes during his time in the Patriots’ video department, which ended after the 2002 Super Bowl.

The last tape, in September 2002 against the Chargers, was shot by someone else after Walsh left the video department for a job in the scouting department that ended in early 2003.

The Chargers tape shows raw footage, Levy said, of the San Diego coaches from the Patriots’ sideline, followed by a shot of the scoreboard showing time, down and distance. The tape contains no footage of actual plays during the game, only the sequence, which the Patriots could match to play tape.

The other seven tapes are more sophisticated. They show shots of the opposing coaches’ signals, followed immediately by a shot of the play, usually from the end zone camera, Levy said.

The tape from the A.F.C. championship game is the most extensive, showing two angles of each play.

Goodell has left open the possibility that additional evidence will lead to additional penalties against Coach Bill Belichick and the Patriots.

After the Jets game, Goodell levied a total of $750,000 in fines and docked the Patriots a first-round draft pick.

After this year’s Super Bowl, Goodell met with Specter and revealed for the first time that Belichick’s illegal signal filming dated to the beginning of his tenure with the Patriots, in 2000. Some accounts said Belichick admitted to taping defensive signals, others just signals in general.

At the Super Bowl, Goodell said of the Patriots’ practice of taping, “I don’t think it taints their accomplishments.”

Under Belichick, the Patriots rose from one of the league’s middling teams to its best, winning three Super Bowls in four seasons. Last season, they went undefeated until losing to the Giants in the Super Bowl.

Based on a win-loss tally from games after the ones on tapes provided by Walsh, the Patriots went 9-6 against the Dolphins after the first taping. They also went 12-1 against the Bills, 3-0 against the Browns, 4-1 against the Steelers and 3-1 against the Chargers. This included three victories and no defeats in the playoffs.

“We consider the tapes of our coaching staff during our games against the New England Patriots to be a nonissue,” the Steelers chairman, Dan Rooney, said in a statement released in February.

Telephone messages to the five teams left Wednesday night were not answered.

Since Belichick’s first season in New England, when the Patriots finished 5-11, they have gone 86-26 in the regular season, a .768 winning percentage. It remains unclear whether the league will make the tapes public. During the initial investigation into the Patriots, the league accepted seven tapes gathered by the team, dating to 2006, while collecting a written promise that it possessed no more. The N.F.L. destroyed the tapes that the Patriots turned over.

Under the indemnity agreement, Walsh’s lawyer can keep one copy of each tape, but he cannot release it without the league’s consent.

ARZCardinals
05-08-2008, 07:45 AM
This could get very interesting...here's why...

During the previous Spygate Billy B met with Roger G. to discuss the issue of taping. I'm sure Roger asked was this the only incident. If Billy B. stated 'yep, that's the only time we ever did that.' Roger G. is gonna be ticked off.

on the other hand

if billy b stated, 'hell no, we've been taping every game for years and years.' Roger G will take the tapes, call Billy B. and say 'I'm tired of this....you better hope you keep your nose clean or I'm gonna clean it for you.' After that call he'll be calling the Krafts (owners of the Pats) to tell them the same thing... 'one more mess up and I'll crush ya.'

Either way...I have no respect for Billy B, the Krafts or the Pats. EVERY TIME THEY SHOW ANY PATS SUPER BOWL WIN...THEY'LL GET NO RESPECT FROM ME....NOT ONLY THAT, EVERY TIME SOMEONE SAY'S 'PATRIOTS' MY FIRST WORDS BEFORE THEY SAY ANYTHING ELSE WILL BE 'CHEATERS!'

EVERY TITLE THEY GOT = NOTHING - They may have enjoyed the moments they won, but I'll never give them respect.

kjbad
05-08-2008, 07:49 AM
I thought Belichick already said something about thinking it was OK to tape, so he did it frequently...but either way, having multiple camera angles of plays after signals were called is not good.

Seahawks4ever
05-09-2008, 11:24 AM
ESPN was reporting during last nights SC that Goodell said that the information on the tapes is consistent with what BB has already owned up to and what he was already punished for.

My guess is, this is the last we hear of this incident.

Tiz
05-09-2008, 08:27 PM
ESPN was reporting during last nights SC that Goodell said that the information on the tapes is consistent with what BB has already owned up to and what he was already punished for.

My guess is, this is the last we hear of this incident.


what irks me about this is that Goodell had announced what Belliflop owned up to going into the pro bowl, AFTER, news of more tapes being out there.

It makes it seem, atleast to me, that Goodell is extending what Bellichek admitted to in light of the new evidence in order to keep from having to deal with this further or issue a real punishment.

BullheadCardFan
05-10-2008, 03:14 PM
It seems to me that the Pats are getting favoritism .. again. Any other team does this and the story is completely different.

Reckon
05-11-2008, 01:44 AM
Walsh’s tapes show that the Patriots recorded the signals of offensive and defensive coaches in regular-season games against the Miami Dolphins, the Buffalo Bills, the Cleveland Browns and the San Diego Chargers and against the Pittsburgh Steelers in the 2002 American Football Conference championship game.

I went to a Browns board to see what they had to say about this and they were wondering, was Belichick taping the Browns to show his team how NOT to play the game? :rofl:

kjbad
05-12-2008, 06:46 AM
I'm thinking that the difference between his stint in CLE and his run in NE has everything to do with the change in "scouting technique". Not saying the man can't coach, just saying that a little help goes a long way.

Tiz
05-12-2008, 07:11 AM
I'm thinking that the difference between his stint in CLE and his run in NE has everything to do with the change in "scouting technique". Not saying the man can't coach, just saying that a little help goes a long way.

I'm thinking the same thing. It's just funny how after the 1st two superbowls it was rammed down our throats how NE was doing it with class and high character guys.

kjbad
05-12-2008, 07:44 AM
There is a double standard out there...but it's a competitive league, and guys will all want to get an advantage. Too bad no one will really care when it's all said and done.

kjbad
05-14-2008, 07:35 AM
The NFL is already putting their spin on this one...

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/05/14/sports/football/14nfl.html?_r=1&oref=slogin&ref=football&pagewanted=print

May 14, 2008

N.F.L. Says Tapes Add Nothing to Inquiry
By JOHN BRANCH and JUDY BATTISTA

N.F.L. Commissioner Roger Goodell said Tuesday that the former New England Patriots employee Matt Walsh had provided no new information about the team’s illicit videotaping tactics, and that the team and its coach, Bill Belichick, would not be punished further.

At a news conference in New York, the league showed the videos turned over last week by Walsh, a former Patriots video assistant. In the eight tapes — involving six games and five opponents from 2000 to 2002 — the camera was trained on the opposing teams’ assistant coaches as they sent signals to their players on the field, and then it showed the ensuing plays.

Walsh and Michael Levy, his lawyer, did not answer questions from members of the news media before flying to Washington to meet with Senator Arlen Specter, Republican of Pennsylvania, who has been critical of how the N.F.L. investigated the Patriots. Specter scheduled a news conference for Wednesday.

Goodell said his meeting with Walsh, which lasted more than three hours, put an end to the league’s investigation into the Patriots’ activities. “As I stand before you today, I don’t know where else I would turn,” Goodell said. “I asked him that question and he said very clearly, ‘I don’t know of anybody else who has information.’ ”

Goodell said Walsh told him that the tapes of opponents’ signals were not used during the games, but that he would deliver them after games to Ernie Adams, one of Belichick’s assistants. Goodell added that Walsh said he knew that what he was doing was probably against league rules.

Walsh said he was under the direction of Jimmy Dee, the team’s video director during Walsh’s tenure.

Mike Martz, the coach of the Rams when they lost to the Patriots in the 2002 Super Bowl, said in an interview at the N.F.L. scouting combine in February that stealing an opponent’s defensive signals would provide a big advantage.

“If you can tell the quarterback what he’s going to get defensively, it makes a great deal of difference,” said Martz, now the 49ers’ offensive coordinator. “Obviously it’s important. If it wasn’t important, guys wouldn’t try to get signals.”

Early each game week, teams give players a DVD — it used to be a videotape — as a primary study aid. Generally, the DVDs have recent footage of the next opponent. A defensive player, for example, would receive a DVD of plays by the opponent’s offense. Teams can create subsets of plays for players — plays run from inside the 20-yard line, for example, or on third-and-long.

The perspective is different from what is seen by television viewers. It usually features wide views from the end zone and the sideline so that all the players on the field can be seen on the screen. In between plays, the scoreboard is shown so the viewer knows the down, distance, score and time remaining.

The Patriots added an element — sideline signals from the opposing coaching staff. This way, they could not only study what plays an opposing team might call in various situations, but also how an opposing coach would signal for such plays.

Among the questions that remain unanswered: How widespread were tapes of the opposing signals distributed — to all coaches and players, or only to a select few? And, despite what Walsh told Goodell, did the Patriots ever decode signals during a game?

“Then why are you doing it against teams you aren’t going to play again that season?” said Mark Schlereth, a former N.F.L. offensive lineman and an ESPN football analyst.

Among the tapes that Walsh gave to the N.F.L. was one against the Pittsburgh Steelers in a conference championship game. Others were against teams the Patriots were unlikely to face in the playoffs.

Schlereth said that the breadth of information on the tapes — mainly, the coaches’ signals and the subsequent play — would be simple for someone to analyze during a game. There are enough plays in the first quarter, he said, to glean any team’s “staples,” and a quick view of them could prove immediately helpful.

“I don’t see them wasting time if they weren’t using it in that game,” Schlereth said.

The league’s investigation of the Patriots began in September, after they were caught filming the Jets’ defensive signals in the season opener. Four days after that incident, Goodell fined Belichick $500,000 and the Patriots $250,000. New England also lost a first-round draft pick for what the league called “totality of conduct.”

Walsh’s name first surfaced in The New York Times on Feb. 1, two days before the Super Bowl. After the Super Bowl, Goodell told Specter that Belichick had admitted taping opponents’ signals since the beginning of his tenure in New England.

Belichick said he misinterpreted a rule in the league’s constitution and bylaws.

In response to a question at Tuesday’s news conference about whether Belichick knew he was breaking league rules, Goodell said, “I’m pretty well on the record here that I didn’t accept Bill Belichick’s explanation for what happened, and I still don’t to this day.”

Goodell also said that Walsh had no knowledge of a videotape of the St. Louis Rams’ walkthrough from the day before the 2002 Super Bowl. The Boston Herald, citing an anonymous source, reported the existence of a walkthrough tape from 2002 the day before the Patriots lost to the Giants in this year’s Super Bowl.

Walsh told Goodell he was inside the Louisiana Superdome during the Rams’ walkthrough — at times on the sidelines, wearing Patriots gear — working to set up communications equipment, Goodell said. And, according to Gregg Levy, a lawyer for the N.F.L., Walsh was later asked by the former Patriots assistant coach Brian Daboll — now on the Jets’ staff — if he had seen anything during the walkthrough. Walsh remembered telling Daboll that running back Marshall Faulk was being used to receive kicks, and he described how the Rams’ tight ends were being deployed.

“We were also able to verify that there was no Rams walkthrough tape,” Goodell said. “No one asked him to tape the walkthrough. He’s not aware of anybody else who may have taped the walkthrough. He had not seen such a tape. He does not know of anybody who says there is a tape.”

In a statement, the Patriots said: “We hope that with Matt Walsh’s disclosures, everyone will finally believe what we have been saying all along and emphatically stated on the day of the initial report: The suggestion that the New England Patriots recorded the St. Louis Rams’ walkthrough on the day before Super Bowl XXXVI in 2002 is absolutely false.”

Daboll was interviewed as part of the N.F.L. investigation and did not report the two things Walsh mentioned. The league plans to interview Daboll again.

Jets Coach Eric Mangini, a former member of Belichick’s staff, was also interviewed as part of the investigation.

According to Goodell, Walsh said the Patriots might have allowed a player listed on injured reserve to practice during the 2001 season, and that Walsh said he helped Patriots players scalp Super Bowl tickets — as many as 12 — over the course of two seasons. Both would be violations of league rules, and Goodell said the N.F.L. would investigate.

Walsh told Goodell he was unaware of any other rules violations, Goodell said.

BullheadCardFan
05-14-2008, 08:31 PM
Congress is now looking into this mess. Hopefully they uncover the real truth.

BullheadCardFan
05-14-2008, 09:02 PM
Specter: Spygate not over

Questfor31
05-14-2008, 09:16 PM
It will be interesting to monitor how far Alren Specter goes with his investigation. Interesting site on this - http://www.tinfoilonmyhead.com/

Cardiackid
05-14-2008, 09:20 PM
Congress is now looking into this mess. Hopefully they uncover the real truth.
Congress and Spector in particular need to get off their highhorse and forget the NFL and start taking care of business like WARS! Hello we have Americans giving there lives everyday for us and all they can think about is Spygate? Give me a break. These guys are a ******* joke. There are much more important things going on for Spector and Congress to worry about than Spygate. And our taxes are paying there paychecks! HMMMM Imagine that!