PDA

View Full Version : Trade idea


AZCARDSFAN89
10-20-2009, 04:25 PM
What about getting Shaun Rogers? I've read he is tradeable at this time, so why not? Instant upgrade, will cause double teams whenever he's out there. I think bringing him to a contender will rejuvinate him. Free up DD from his double teams. Which would open up things more for the LB and Campbell. He would bloster an already stong run D, and could help free up people for the pass rush.

Just a thought.

LD14
10-20-2009, 04:42 PM
No cap room

AZCARDSFAN89
10-20-2009, 05:21 PM
Once we let Dansby walk we do. He makes 2.4m this year then 6.9, 5.5, 5.6, and 5.5 over the next few years.

I don't see us keeping Dansby

Hypothesis
10-20-2009, 05:33 PM
Trade deadline has passed.

Flip
10-20-2009, 11:22 PM
What about getting Shaun Rogers? I've read he is tradeable at this time, so why not? Instant upgrade, will cause double teams whenever he's out there. I think bringing him to a contender will rejuvinate him. Free up DD from his double teams. Which would open up things more for the LB and Campbell. He would bloster an already stong run D, and could help free up people for the pass rush.

Just a thought.

Not sure Dline would be the most glaring weakness to address, that guy is intriguing though with the career he has had

LD14
10-21-2009, 12:22 AM
Not sure Dline would be the most glaring weakness to address, that guy is intriguing though with the career he has had

Dline isnt weak, but NT is. I would argue that the Browns would want too much, though I'm sure if Bidwell showed up in a Jets uniform, then we would land him for a 7th.

flagstaff card
10-21-2009, 12:32 AM
Dline isnt weak, but NT is. I would argue that the Browns would want too much, though I'm sure if Bidwell showed up in a Jets uniform, then we would land him for a 7th.

NT is fine BR,GW,AB.Plus CC and KI can play there. LB is the concern; KD gone,BB,CO old; GH love this cat but; we need to start grooming someone to take over.CB and WD this years picks we'll see.

rageon79
10-21-2009, 02:48 PM
I say no way. He takes plays off, he was absolutely huge last year i meen fat, seems in better shape this year. But if he gets paid and a good contract. He will get fat again and just ride out his contract. No I think we can find someone good in the draft. Also I think its evident what we need is secondary help. Maybe a LB if Dansby leaves. If. Our secondary sickens me at times. Dont know if its the play calling, the lack of pressure on qb, or what. But at times they look terrible. Im not a big fan of Mcfadden. I think hes to slow to be a corner. Good zone defender but not fast enough to cover fast receivers.:cardinals: :cardinals:

LD14
10-21-2009, 04:42 PM
NT is fine BR,GW,AB.Plus CC and KI can play there. LB is the concern; KD gone,BB,CO old; GH love this cat but; we need to start grooming someone to take over.CB and WD this years picks we'll see.

BR is about as old as dinosaurs, doesn't draw the double. Watson is in a contract year, injury concerns. Branch hasn't shown anything really cept a few flashes this year. This position should be looked into the next draft and it wouldn't surprise me if we drafted a couple.

Our secondary sickens me at times. Dont know if its the play calling, the lack of pressure on qb, or what. But at times they look terrible. Im not a big fan of Mcfadden. I think hes to slow to be a corner. Good zone defender but not fast enough to cover fast receivers.:cardinals: :cardinals:

Secondary actually has a considerable amount of talent, the problem is scheme and lack of pass rush.

howejo
10-22-2009, 06:55 AM
Our no1 need next season will be LB and OL without a doubt IMO. We need a C and our LBs are gettin on the D line is good IMO

AussieCardinal
10-22-2009, 09:54 PM
Isnt he a nutcase??