View Poll Results: #2 quarterback

Voters
39. You may not vote on this poll
  • Drew Stanton

    14 35.90%
  • Blaine Gabbert

    25 64.10%
Page 2 of 6 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 58

Thread: #2 Quarterback part II

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    2,182

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by native az View Post
    As I have said before. Who ******** cares. Stanton is a backup that should never be a stater. Gabbert is also a backup that should never be a starter. Having either one on the roster puts us no closer to having someone that can replace Palmer. Meanwhile all around the league rookie QBs look to be doing just fine from a supposed class that didn't have any good ones. D. Watson especially.

    Sad.
    It's PRESEASON football for crying out loud. The only relevant game play is when the number ones are on the field and even that is questionable.

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    5,763

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by boomer719 View Post
    It's PRESEASON football for crying out loud. The only relevant game play is when the number ones are on the field and even that is questionable.
    Oh I see so why does this thread even exist?
    Or the one about Nkemdiche?

    Let's not cherry pick. Either preseason is meaningless or we can tell somethings.
    Still searching for our QBOF.

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Posts
    697

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by native az View Post
    Oh I see so why does this thread even exist?
    Or the one about Nkemdiche?

    Let's not cherry pick. Either preseason is meaningless or we can tell somethings.
    NK is a bust and Stanton is the QB of the future. It means something different to everyone.

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    4,534

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by native az View Post
    As I have said before. Who ******** cares. Stanton is a backup that should never be a stater. Gabbert is also a backup that should never be a starter. Having either one on the roster puts us no closer to having someone that can replace Palmer. Meanwhile all around the league rookie QBs look to be doing just fine from a supposed class that didn't have any good ones. D. Watson especially.

    Sad.
    Really?

    http://www.azcardinals.com/news-and-...1-f74218580166

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    5,763

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ~Main Event~ View Post
    What does Logan Thomas have to do with what I said?
    Still searching for our QBOF.

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    4,534

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by native az View Post
    What does Logan Thomas have to do with what I said?
    Logan is a punching bag on here for QB selections but balled in the preseason (11-12 123 TD, no INT debut). Don't get sucked in by practice squad bodies doing vanilla defenses

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    1,948

    Default

    My observations of the game. The 1st and 2nd string line are pretty good. After that it gets sketchy. The 3rd string can't open any holes for the RB, and Gabbert at the beginning didn't have any time to throw. By the time he got back and set up the D was on him. He was pretty much running for his life where Stanton had a pretty clean pocket the whole time he was out there.

    Stanton looked good. He didn't do anything to make me believe he is no more than a career back up. Which is what he has been his whole career. He doesn't have the throwing skills Gabbert does. His arm may be just as strong but he doesn't have the accuracy on his placement of his passes.

    Gabbert went 5 of 9 with 2 drops for 53 yards. One in the end zone. Add in those 2 drops that were squarely on the receivers and now he is 7 for 9. Add in about another 24 yards and he is 5 of 9 for 77 yards. That's 8.5 yards per completion. Those are good numbers. He also stood in the pocket and took some hits trying to complete passes. That to me was the biggest thing I got out of the game. He isn't gun shy and will stand back there to try and complete passes rather than tucking it and run at the first sign his protection is breaking down.

    Penny is a pourer power back. He heeds a whole at the point of attack. He isn't going to juke any defenders and not make many people miss. He also isn't going to go looking for any other wholes. When he has a whole and can get some momentum he is a load to bring down. Kid can move the pile, and is faster than I thought once he gets it going.

    AE is still AE. Still not a very good runner and doesn't finish off runs. He might make the team now that Logan is out for a while. Still easily replaceable.

    Well that's my take on what I saw yesterday.

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    5,763

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ~Main Event~ View Post
    Logan is a punching bag on here for QB selections but balled in the preseason (11-12 123 TD, no INT debut). Don't get sucked in by practice squad bodies doing vanilla defenses
    Not getting sucked in by anything. We are going to carry 3 QBs into the season and 2 of them are nothing but career backups. We should have drafted a QB that could be a starter if we were going to carry three QBs. DS and BG are fighting for the backup spot which is totally silly. If either one has to start for significant time this season we are toast. Oh and all the people talking about how BG is so much better than Stanton have disappeared.

    Logan was a crap pick and should not be compared to the QBs we could have taken. Not only that we wasted 3 years I believe to find out he was crap.
    Still searching for our QBOF.

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    Macomb, Il. 61455
    Posts
    3,656

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by native az View Post
    Not getting sucked in by anything. We are going to carry 3 QBs into the season and 2 of them are nothing but career backups. We should have drafted a QB that could be a starter if we were going to carry three QBs. DS and BG are fighting for the backup spot which is totally silly. If either one has to start for significant time this season we are toast. Oh and all the people talking about how BG is so much better than Stanton have disappeared.

    Logan was a crap pick and should not be compared to the QBs we could have taken. Not only that we wasted 3 years I believe to find out he was crap.
    Nope LT was cut in the 2nd season.

    And another prognostication based on ifs. Of course it's just opinions and should be taken as such. Right?

    JosEPh

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    5,763

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by JosEPh_II View Post
    Nope LT was cut in the 2nd season.

    And another prognostication based on ifs. Of course it's just opinions and should be taken as such. Right?

    JosEPh
    What ifs are you speaking of?
    Still searching for our QBOF.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •