Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 24

Thread: Who would you rather have

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    2,248

    Default Who would you rather have

    Who would you rather have in the draft ? Rudolph or Lauletta ? I'm leaning towards Lauletta. Think in time he will be better than Rudolph. Main thing I have against Rudolph is he is another Palmer. You know where he is going to be in the pocket and doesn't have that much escape ability. Tired of QB with lead feet. Same goes for Fauk. Another stationary QB.

    The NFL is changing. In todays game you need a QB who can escape the rush. Not necessarily a running QB, but someone who can get out side the rush and put pressure on the D to pick up an chunk of yards. Someone like Rogers or Wilson. Someone looking to throw first but can and will tuck it and Run. Neither Rudolph or
    Fauk bring that element.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Posts
    4,087

    Default

    They are about the same. But considering Rudolph put up better numbers vs stiffer competition, he deserves the edge.

    2nd-3rd round each

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Location
    Alberta
    Posts
    140

    Default

    Others have mentioned Lauletta is more intelligent,
    its hard to say how smart Rudolph would have looked against teams in the Colonial because he was too busy putting up numbers in the Big 12.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    The Verde Valley
    Posts
    7,900

    Default

    Flip of a coin to me with a slight edge going to MR.....very slight
    The Wilks era begin

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    8,505

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Hank Hill View Post
    Its hard to say how smart Rudolph would have looked against teams in the Colonial because he was too busy putting up numbers in the Big 12.
    True.

    He would have actually had to run a pro-style offense, go through progressions, and make anticipatory NFL reads/throws. Since he did none of that at Oklahoma State, we don't know.

    We know that Lauletta can. Against weaker competition.

    There's the rub.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Feb 2018
    Posts
    67

    Default r, l, f

    cards should bug beliceks phone and draft the one that he likes...lol

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    6,621

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Itancan View Post
    Who would you rather have in the draft ? Rudolph or Lauletta ? I'm leaning towards Lauletta. Think in time he will be better than Rudolph. Main thing I have against Rudolph is he is another Palmer. You know where he is going to be in the pocket and doesn't have that much escape ability. Tired of QB with lead feet. Same goes for Fauk. Another stationary QB.

    The NFL is changing. In todays game you need a QB who can escape the rush. Not necessarily a running QB, but someone who can get out side the rush and put pressure on the D to pick up an chunk of yards. Someone like Rogers or Wilson. Someone looking to throw first but can and will tuck it and Run. Neither Rudolph or
    Fauk bring that element.

    Neither one.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    6,621

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jeffcardinalfan View Post
    cards should bug beliceks phone and draft the one that he likes...lol

    That would be Falk.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    6,972

    Default

    Backups in the NFL.
    Still searching for our QBOF.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    4,784

    Default

    I see both as career backups

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •